Members of Parliament (MPs) in Kenya are urging the government to reconsider the newly introduced funding model for universities. The MPs argue that the current model, which allows universities to charge high fees, is unsustainable and detrimental to students from all socio-economic backgrounds. They are calling for a return to the capitation system, where funding is allocated based on the number of students enrolled. With concerns over the affordability and access to higher education, this debate is critical in ensuring equal opportunities for all students.
.png)
Rising Tuition Fees:
One of the main concerns expressed by MPs is the significant increase in tuition fees within universities under the new funding model. Nyando MP Jared Okelo highlighted the alarming reality that the lowest fees being charged per year by universities now stands at a staggering figure of KES 258,000. The perceived unaffordability of higher education is causing great distress among students and their families, potentially limiting access and hindering national development.
The Capitation System:
MPs propose reverting to the capitation system, which was in place before the introduction of the new funding model. Under this approach, universities received funding based on the number of students they enrolled. This system was aimed at providing more equitable funding and ensuring that financial constraints did not hinder students' access to education. The MPs believe that reverting to this model would restore affordability and widen the opportunity for students from all backgrounds to pursue higher education.
Concerns for Students from Poor Backgrounds:
President William Ruto had initially unveiled the new university and Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) funding model on May 3, with a primary focus on benefiting students from extremely poor backgrounds. However, MPs argue that the current funding model still places a burden on students who cannot afford the steep fees charged by universities. The call to reassess the funding model is, therefore, aimed at ensuring that students from all socio-economic backgrounds can pursue higher education without being subjected to financial strain.
Addressing Affordability and Accessibility:
The debate surrounding the university funding model is crucial in addressing the issues of affordability and accessibility in higher education. Education is a fundamental right, and it is the responsibility of both the government and lawmakers to ensure that every Kenyan has an equal opportunity to access quality education. By reevaluating the funding model, MPs are advocating for a fair and inclusive system that supports students from diverse backgrounds and fosters national development.
Considerations for Sustainable Solutions:
As discussions continue regarding the university funding model, it is essential for stakeholders to explore sustainable solutions. This includes finding a balance that considers both the financial constraints faced by universities and the affordability concerns raised by students and their families. By engaging in meaningful dialogue and working collaboratively, the government, MPs, and educational institutions can develop a funding model that promotes affordability, accessibility, and excellence in higher education.
Conclusion:
The call by Members of Parliament to reassess the new university funding model highlights the critical need for affordability and accessibility in higher education. As concerns over rising tuition fees persist, it is imperative for the government to reconsider the capitation system and explore alternative funding models that ensure all students have equal opportunities to pursue higher education. By addressing these challenges, Kenya can foster a more inclusive and prosperous future, driven by a well-educated and skilled workforce.
